In the Harberger Taxes is an economic abstraction that aims to democratize the control of assets between private and commons ownership. In this taxation system, asset owners self-assess the value of assets they own and pay a tax rate of X% on that value. Whatever value owners specify for the asset, they have to be willing to part ways and sell it to anyone at that price.
💡 Harberger Taxes was repopularized by Radical Markets.
The emerging field of cryptoeconomics uses both cryptography and economic incentives to design decentralized applications. Smart contracts defines the rules of an economic game which incentivize rational actors to behave in optimally desirable ways.
Previously, it was difficult or even impossible for economists to test these ideas in a real environment. Blockchains offer a testing ground for economic abstractions such as Harberger Taxes, where rules can be enforced with smart contracts.
Let’s examine the Harberger Tax model and discover how we can use it in decentralized applications.
Every citizen and corporation would self-assess the value of assets they possess, pay a roughly 7% tax on these values, and is required to sell the assets to anyone willing to purchase them at this self-assessed price.
Harberger Taxes works as follows:
- Asset owners determines the value of their asset, and pay taxes on that price.
- Anyone at any time can acquire an asset at the owner’s price, immediately taking ownership of the asset upon purchase. The new owner then sets a new price.
Asset owners are incentivized to set a low price to minimize the amount taxes they have to pay. At the same time, owners are incentivized to set a price high enough to discourage others from buying it away too easily. This creates a balancing act for owners to price an asset at the value they are willing to pay to keep it.
Because of these opposing pressures, asset owners can’t set impossibly high prices nor refuse reasonably priced offers. This creates a more efficient market.
In the next section, we’ll implement Harberger Taxes on Ethereum. We’ll start with a Solidity smart contract to collect taxes from asset owners.
First, define a marketplace of assets that users will own and trade with each other. Each Asset has an asset Id, an
owner address if any, and a
The self-assessed price of an asset determines the amount of tax its
owner will have to pay to keep it.
In our implementation, we collect taxes on demand from prepaid balances maintained by each account. We will collect taxes via a
TaxCollector contract maintains balances of prepaid tax payments for each
Asset in the marketplace.
Asset owners calls
deposit() to top up their tax payment balance with Ether:
Note that whenever an
Assetis created by the
Marketplacecontract, a corresponding
TaxBalanceshould be created for that asset, with zero balance and
lastCollectedAtset to the asset creation date. This keeps track of tax payments of each asset. For simplicity, this step is omitted from the sample code.
collect() taxes in batches on demand. If during tax collection the asset owner has insufficient advance tax
balance for the tax period between the last collection date and the present time, the asset owner will have failed to pay their tax. It’s the responsibility of the asset owner to ensure that they have set aside enough tax payments for their asset.
Let’s first define a function for calculating the taxes owed for an asset:
Here’s our tax
Remember that the amount of Harberger taxes paid is proportional to a given asset’s price and the duration that the asset is held. In the above code:
- First, we retrieve the asset’s
- We check if the asset owner has deposited sufficient advance
taxOwed()for the asset.
- If there is sufficient balance, we transfer the taxes owed to the
taxRecipientaddress and update the asset’s advance tax
lastCollectedAt. The asset owner has successfully paid their Harberger Tax and continues to own it.
- If there is insufficient balance, we foreclose the asset.
Note that the above function has an
onlyCollector modifier that makes
collect() only be callable only by whitelisted tax collector addresses.
Failure to pay tax will result in an asset’s foreclosure. A foreclosed
owner set to
address(0) which means it is open for auction.
The sample code is simplified for clarity, but you can fill in the rest. The basic harberger tax calculation, deposits, and collection is implemented.
Let’s look at how Harberger Taxes can be used in real-life applications.
With Harberger taxes, users will know what the going price is for any asset. This results in liquid markets where anyone can make an offer even if the owner is not actively selling.
In recent years we’ve seen the proliferation of new forms of art funding such as subscription patronage to crowdfunding. The blockchain offers even more opportunities to re-imagine how we fund and support creators and artists.
Rare Patrons offers a radical market approach for fans to participate in supporting their favourite creators.
Rare Patrons works as follows:
- Every musician has a single patron seat.
- Anyone can buy the patron seat (to become the singular patron & gain the privilege of being the patron).
- Upon buying it they have to self-assess the value of this seat (being the patron).
- During the tenure of being a patron, this patron has to pay a > percentage fee (say 5%) of the self-assessed seat value per year as their patronage to the musician.
- At any point in time, someone else can buy this patron seat at this self-assessed value, changing ownership.
- Upon being “dethroned” as the rare patron for a specific musician, that patron earns a collectible “Post-Patron” badge, signifying that they were a patron at a certain point in history. They just join the “Patrons Club”.
- They can choose to sell this collectible if they no longer want it.
New funding models are now made possible with smart contracts.
When a patent requires the active payment of a nonzero amount of tax, patent trolls have less of an incentive to ‘squat’ useless works that have no value beyond being useful in a suit in the future. It also makes the IP market more liquid.
Cryptocommunities (or DAOs) can use Harberger taxes to strike a balance between private and commons ownership.
Given a community with scarce assets, how can we allocate it efficiently to productive members of the community? Exclusive ownership of a community asset can be taxed, ensuring that those that value it the most have access. Failing to pay the tax will trigger a forced auction of the asset that all community members can participate in.
Cryptocommunities can coordinate between themselves how taxes are utilized. For example, taxes can go to a curve-bonded reserve via sponsored burning. Alternatively, this reserve can be redistributed to the community as a universal basic income, or go to a community fund that is governed by a DAO.
Harberger taxes and other emerging cryptoeconomic primitives offers new ways for individuals to coordinate at scale.
In this article, we’ve looked at Harberger Taxes and how we can use it in decentralized applications. While it remains a challenge to implement new economic abstractions in the real world, the blockchain offers a valuable testing ground for new mechanisms of cooperation.
📬 Get updates straight to your inbox.
Subscribe to my newsletter to make sure you don't miss anything.